Rhythm
b. 20
|
composition: Op. 22, Polonaise
..
In the main text we change the way the extension of the f bass note was written – the notation used by Chopin in analogous b. 168 seems to be clearer in this context. The missing extension of f in EE may be explained by an oversight of the engraver or by a later correction performed in FE. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Different values of chord components , Errors in EE , Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||
b. 31
|
composition: Op. 22, Polonaise category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions |
||||||
b. 32
|
composition: Op. 22, Polonaise
..
The missing tie of b is almost certainly a mistake – analogous b. 176 does contain a tie; in [A] b. 176 was almost certainly written in an abridged manner as repetition of b. 32. category imprint: Editorial revisions issues: Errors in FE |
||||||
b. 32
|
composition: Op. 22, Polonaise category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE |
||||||
b. 57
|
composition: Op. 22, Polonaise
..
It is unclear whether the version of EE is the original notation, changed in FE (→GE) in the penultimate stage of proofreading, or a revision of EE. According to us, the former is much more likely. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: EE revisions , Authentic corrections of FE |