Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main


Articulation, Accents, Hairpins

b. 150

composition: Op. 22, Polonaise

Long accent in FE (→GE1)

Short accent in EE & GE2 (→GE3)

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Long accents , GE revisions , EE inaccuracies

b. 152

composition: Op. 22, Polonaise

No mark in FE (→GE)

Short accent in EE

[] suggested by the editors

..

In the main text we suggest a long accent after an analogous situation in b. 150. The mark was also added in EE; however, a short accent was used (like in the vast majority of cases). 

category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

issues: EE revisions

b. 153-157

composition: Op. 22, Polonaise

Long accents in FE

in GE

Short accents in both hands in EE

..

FE feature long accents under the last quaver in b. 153, 154 and 156. GE reproduced them as a short  hairpin, reaching the 1st quaver of the next bar, which does not influence its meaning in this case (Chopin would sometimes use such notation in two-note motifs). The notation of EE is inaccurate (the use of short accents) and arbitrary (the marks having been doubled in the L.H. part, probably suggested by the authentic notation on the 2nd quaver of these bars).

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Long accents , EE revisions , Inaccuracies in GE

b. 155

composition: Op. 22, Polonaise

No mark in FE (→GE)

Staccato dot in EE

Wedge suggested by the editors

..

The missing staccato mark must be an inaccuracy. In the main text we suggest a wedge, like in the analogous bars. Staccato was also marked in EE, yet with a dot, like in the L.H.

category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

issues: EE revisions

b. 155

composition: Op. 22, Polonaise

No mark in FE (→GE)

Short accent in EE

Long accent suggested by the editors

..

The missing accent in FE (→GE) is probably an inaccuracy related to the transition to a new line. The mark was added in EE (as a short accent). In the main text we suggest a long accent, like in analogous motifs.

category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

issues: EE revisions