b. 25
|
composition: Op. 22, Polonaise
..
In the main text we put the asterisk under the 2nd beat of the bar, in accordance with FE (→EE). The fact that the mark was placed later in GE2 (→GE3) could have been an attempt to reconcile the markings of FE in this bar with the ones in analogous b. 63. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
|||||||
b. 26
|
composition: Op. 22, Polonaise
..
The missing must be an oversight, since this indication is both in analogous b. 64 and b. 170, which was most probably marked in [A] in an abridged manner as repetition of b. 26. category imprint: Editorial revisions |
|||||||
b. 26
|
composition: Op. 22, Polonaise
..
It is likely that the pedalling markings were overlooked, which is indicated by the pedalling markings in similar b. 64 and 66 and, above all, in analogous b. 170, which was most probably marked in [A] in an abridged manner as repetition of b. 26. A similar situation can be found in b. 28. category imprint: Editorial revisions |
|||||||
b. 26
|
composition: Op. 22, Polonaise
..
In the main text we add a cautionary before b and a before f3. The accidentals were also added in GE3. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: GE revisions |
|||||||
b. 27
|
composition: Op. 22, Polonaise
..
The missing asterisk must be considered an inaccuracy, hence in the main text we suggest adding this mark after b. 25. The same applies to analogous b. 171. A mark was added in EE as well as in GE2 (→GE3), although slightly moved. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions |