Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Pedalling
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main


Pedalling

b. 85

composition: Op. 22, Polonaise

  in FE (→EE)

No markings in GE

..

The absence of the first    is most probably a mistake of GE.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in GE

b. 89

composition: Op. 22, Polonaise

No markings in FE (→GE,EE)

[ ] suggested by the editors

..

In the main text we suggest adding pedalling markings after analogous b. 85.

category imprint: Editorial revisions

b. 95

composition: Op. 22, Polonaise

 between notes in FE (→GE1), literal reading

on first note in EE

on 2nd note in GE2 (→GE3)

..

The placement of the  mark in FE (→GE1) is unclear. In the main text we move the mark to the beginning of the bar, in accordance with the distinct markings in the two previous, analogous bars (this is how it was interpreted in EE). In turn, in GE2 (→GE3) the mark was placed only just at the beginning of the semiquaver passage, which is closer to the notation of FE in terms of the visual aspect and can be considered an acceptable variant.

category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions

b. 125

composition: Op. 22, Polonaise

in GE & EE

No sign in FE

..

The missing  mark must be an inaccuracy of FE (it is the last bar in the line), corrected both in GE and EE.

category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions , No pedal release mark

b. 169

composition: Op. 22, Polonaise

on 2nd beat in FE (→EE)

at end of bar in GE

..

The  mark having been placed at the end of the bar in GE is an arbitrary and undoubtedly erroneous revision. In this edition, the pedalling markings were similarly erroneously reproduced also in b. 170, 171 and 172.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions