Pedalling
b. 85
|
composition: Op. 22, Polonaise
..
The absence of the first is most probably a mistake of GE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE |
||||||
b. 89
|
composition: Op. 22, Polonaise
..
In the main text we suggest adding pedalling markings after analogous b. 85. category imprint: Editorial revisions |
||||||
b. 95
|
composition: Op. 22, Polonaise
..
The placement of the mark in FE (→GE1) is unclear. In the main text we move the mark to the beginning of the bar, in accordance with the distinct markings in the two previous, analogous bars (this is how it was interpreted in EE). In turn, in GE2 (→GE3) the mark was placed only just at the beginning of the semiquaver passage, which is closer to the notation of FE in terms of the visual aspect and can be considered an acceptable variant. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions |
||||||
b. 125
|
composition: Op. 22, Polonaise
..
The missing mark must be an inaccuracy of FE (it is the last bar in the line), corrected both in GE and EE. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions , No pedal release mark |
||||||
b. 169
|
composition: Op. 22, Polonaise
..
The mark having been placed at the end of the bar in GE is an arbitrary and undoubtedly erroneous revision. In this edition, the pedalling markings were similarly erroneously reproduced also in b. 170, 171 and 172. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions |