data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73ecd/73ecd80c88ad44c39f3711b6bcc33ca9e1021267" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75013/75013441a15e45e6f391d55c49aaf803f3dff8a4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57140/571405c7057401412640722d57e0f4262876af22" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3075f/3075f31e8b155e01785c3a53896ad205598099cf" alt=""
b. 224
|
composition: Op. 22, Polonaise
..
In the main text we suggest adding an accent at the beginning of this bar. The accent is present in all three repetitions of this bar (in b. 228, 244 and 248), and, according to us, it is the composer's inadvertence or a mistake of the engraver of FE that are the most likely reasons for the absence of an accent in the discussed bar. category imprint: Editorial revisions |
|||||
b. 224
|
composition: Op. 22, Polonaise
..
In the main text we add staccato dots under the last two quavers after analogous b. 228 and 248. There is a similar situation in b. 244. category imprint: Editorial revisions |
|||||
b. 224
|
composition: Op. 22, Polonaise
..
EE1 is lacking in the cautionary flats before a category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , Cautionary accidentals , Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||
b. 225
|
composition: Op. 22, Polonaise
..
FE are lacking in the category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Accidentals in different octaves , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions |
|||||
b. 227
|
composition: Op. 22, Polonaise
..
Just like in b. 223, the version of EE1 is probably Chopin's mistake adopted from a proof copy of FE. The natural raising a category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Omission of current key accidentals , Authentic corrections of FE , Last key signature sign |