Issues : Long accents
- « Previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next »
b. 106
|
composition: Op. 22, Andante spianato
..
Both the missing accent in EE1 and its placement on the 3rd semiquaver of the bar in GE1 (→GE2) must be mistakes. The oversight of the accent in EE1 could have been repeated after FE, in which the mark was then added in the last phase of proofreading. The addition of the accent in EE2 in an erroneous place may mean that the reviser did not compare this bar with b. 62, but with GE1 (there is also a possibility that it is simply a mistake, e.g. of the engraver). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents , EE revisions , Errors in EE , Errors in GE , GE revisions |
|||||||||||||||||||
b. 111-112
|
composition: Op. 22, Andante spianato
..
In the main text we suggest differentiated accents after analogous b. 67-68 and 70-71. In the face of uncertainty concerning Chopin's intention as to the type of the accents used, the remaining versions can be considered equivalent variants. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Long accents , Inaccuracies in GE , GE revisions |
- « Previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next »