Issues : Long accents
- « Previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next »
b. 80-93
|
composition: Op. 22, Andante spianato
..
In the main text we give the accents in b. 80, 81, 84, 92 and 93 as short ones in accordance with the analysis of the notation of FE in b. 67-72. We may consider the notation of GE1, in which we interpret the respective marks as long accents, to be an equivalent variant. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Long accents |
||||||||||||
b. 85-89
|
composition: Op. 22, Andante spianato
..
In accordance with the analysis carried out in b. 73-75, in the main text we move the accents in b. 85, 86 and 89:
We reproduce the long (GE1) or short (the remaining sources) accents in accordance with the analysis of b. 67-72. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Long accents , EE revisions |
||||||||||||
b. 90
|
composition: Op. 22, Andante spianato
..
In the main text we suggest adding an accent in the L.H. after analogous b. 78. The mark was already added in EE. The accent may be considered short or long: see b. 67-72. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Long accents , EE revisions |
||||||||||||
b. 96
|
composition: Op. 22, Andante spianato
category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Long accents |
||||||||||||
b. 99-105
|
composition: Op. 22, Andante spianato
..
Contrary to b. 55-62, FE include long accents here, i.e. in b. 99-100 and 103-105. We consider it an inaccuracy and we give short accents in the main text. The remaining editions repeated here the accents used for the first time: long in GE1, vertical in EE and short in GE2 (→GE3). See also b. 106, which we discuss separately due to the mistakes in GE and EE. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Long accents , EE revisions |
- « Previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next »