Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main


Articulation, Accents, Hairpins

b. 48

composition: Op. 22, Andante spianato

Long accent in FE (→GE1)

Short accent in EE & GE2 (→GE3)

category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources

issues: Long accents , EE inaccuracies

b. 52

composition: Op. 22, Andante spianato

Short accents in FE (→GE)

Vertical accents in EE

..

Arbitrary changes of horizontal accents to vertical ones belong to characteristic, frequent revisions of EE.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions

b. 52

composition: Op. 22, Andante spianato

Wedge in FE (→GE1,EE)

Staccato dot in GE2 (→GE3)

..

The change of the staccato mark is a frequent discretion of GE.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: GE revisions

b. 55-62

composition: Op. 22, Andante spianato

Short accents in FE & GE2 (→GE3)

Long accents in GE1

Vertical accents in EE

..

The accents in b. 55-56 and 59-62 are undoubtedly short in FE, such as in b. 52. In spite of that, GE1 gives here bigger accents, such as in the preceding cantilena section, which is probably inadvertence (the second German edition introduced short accents, like in entire Andante). The introduction of vertical accents is a frequent discretion of EE.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in GE , GE revisions

b. 67-72

composition: Op. 22, Andante spianato

Different accents in FE

Long accents in GE

Short accents in EE & GE2 (→GE3)

..

The accents in b. 67 and 70 are slightly longer in FE than those in b. 68-69 and 71-72. According to us, it may mean that a similar difference was present in [A]. As a result, in the main text we reproduce them as long and short accents, respectively. In GE1 there are no noticeable differences in length between the accents – all marks are of the same size as the majority of the accents in the previous section – hence we give them the form of long accents, just like there. Taking into account the fact that except for the last mark in b. 78 and 90 all accents in this section concern either longer rhythmic values (at least minims) or short motifs, within which a resolution of a dissonance occurs, the version with long accents only can be considered an equivalent variant. In EE and GE2 (→GE3) there are short accents only.

category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources

issues: Long accents , EE inaccuracies