Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Rhythm
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main


Rhythm

b. 412

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III

in A

in GE (→FEEE)

..

In the main text we preserve the unambiguous notation of the rhythm of A. Moving a semiquaver outside the last quaver of the triplet in the bottom voice is an arbitrary action characteristic of GE (→FEEE). The Breitkopf & Härtel publishing house would consistently apply a "mathematical" layout to such groups, denying the currency of the convention used by Chopin even in these places where the notation resulting from such a layout (as the discussed one) was absurd from the pianistic point of view, cf. the Nocturne in C minor, op. 27 no. 1, bars 5-13.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: GE revisions , Dotted rhythms and triplets , Errors repeated in FE , Errors repeated in EE

b. 432-433

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III

f2 tied in A, contextual interpretation

f2 repeated in GE (→FEEE)

..

In A, the tie sustaining fis written only in bar 433, opening a new page in A. It could have been a reason for its omission in GE (→FEEE).

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in GE , Inaccuracies in A

b. 433-437

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III

2 quavers in sources

Triplet suggested by the editors

..

The solution suggested in the main text consisting in treating the quavers on the 1st beat of bars 433 and 437 as the 1st and 3rd notes of a quaver triplet seems to be recommended both due to the musical reasons (in the coda of this movement of the Concerto, there is an absolute supremacy of the triplet movement) and the pianistic ones (hand transfer). Such a notation can be found in Chopin's pieces on several occasions, e.g. in the Sonata in B minor, op. 58, 1st mov., bar 54, the 1st crotchet in the R.H. and the 4th crotchet in the L.H. In the latter, Chopin introduced a rest between two quavers in a pupil's copy.    

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Editorial revisions

b. 448

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III

Crotchet c2 in A

No crotchet in GE (→FEEE)

..

The omission of the additional crotchet stem of cis most probably an oversight of GE (→FEEE).

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in GE

b. 454-455

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III

..

The third at the beginning of bar 454 and the chord at the beginning of bar 455 are written in A with two voices – both dare provided with separate stems pointing upwards. This detail was not reproduced in any of the editions, we omit it in our transcriptions, too. Chopin generally had a practical, pianistic approach and would separate the voices only when they moved in different rhythm – cf. the notation of all the remaining crotchets ending this kind of triplet sequences (bars 410-411, 413-415 and analog.); therefore, this strict, "score-like" notation applied in this place is rather an exception.

category imprint: Editorial revisions; Source & stylistic information

issues: Inaccuracies in GE