Rhythm
b. 235
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
Separating the g2 quaver may be a specification of notation introduced by Chopin in the proofreading of GE1 (→FE→EE, →GE2). category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Authentic corrections of GE |
|||||
b. 241-242
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
The missing tie of g is certainly a mistake of GE1, corrected both in FE – perhaps by Chopin – and GE2. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions , Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||
b. 243
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
In FE the last chord has a quaver stem. The absence of rest, required if the chord was shortened, proves that it is a mistake, probably stemming from a misunderstanding at the time of implementing extensive proofreading of pitch and rhythmic values in bars 243-244. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Errors resulting from corrections |
|||||
b. 245-246
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
The tie of g was not marked by Chopin in any authentic source. If we take into account a similar phrase 4 bars further, one can assume Chopin's oversight. However, since bars 245 and 249 differ in the context in which the g is played, in the main text we leave the version of A. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
|||||
b. 246-247
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
The tie of g was misinterpreted in GE1 (→FE→EE) as combining the e1-g1 third in bar 246 with g in the following bar. GE2 restored the correct text. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions |