|
b. 438
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
In A there is no category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Omissions to cancel alteration , GE revisions , Omission of current key accidentals , Inaccuracies in A |
|||||
|
b. 439
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , Omission of current key accidentals , Inaccuracies in A |
|||||
|
b. 439-440
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
In the main text we add a cautionary category imprint: Editorial revisions issues: Cautionary accidentals |
|||||
|
b. 439
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
The accent in A may be interpreted as both short and long. According to us, the use of a short accent is more likely – the top, shorter arm, written first, seems to convey Chopin's intention better. However, the sign was interpreted in such a way only in GE2. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents , GE revisions |
|||||
|
b. 439
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
The accent added on the d1 minim in EE is most probably a revision (unification with the previous bars), although due to the similarity of the bars, a mistake cannot be excluded. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |
returning c
4. The harmonic context and a comparison with an identical figure four bars earlier prove Chopin's mistake. The sign was added already in 
before g2. At the same time, we omit a similar, yet less justified sign, present in the sources before g1 in the next bar.
