b. 430-433
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
The engraver of GE1 (→FE→EE) may have considered the double slurs to be an unnecessary complication. Cf. bars 472-480. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , GE revisions |
||||||
b. 430
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
The omission of the hairpin in GE1 (→FE→EE) must be an oversight of the engraver. The sign was added in GE2 on the basis of A. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions |
||||||
b. 431
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
The mark placed at the beginning of this bar in A may be interpreted as a long accent, after bar 429, or as a , like in bars 477 and 479, similar in terms of structure. In the main text we include the latter option, in accordance with the way in which the sign was reproduced in GE. The absence of the sign in the remaining editions is most probably a result of an oversight. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness issues: Long accents |
||||||
b. 432-433
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
In A, the tie sustaining f2 is written only in bar 433, opening a new page in A. It could have been a reason for its omission in GE (→FE→EE). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , Inaccuracies in A |
||||||
b. 433
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
In A the notation of accidentals in this bar is inaccurate:
The necessary signs were added already in GE1 (→FE); however, the before the bottom note of the octave in the L.H. at the beginning of the bar was overlooked. EE and GE2 feature the correct notation. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Accidentals in different octaves , GE revisions , Omission of current key accidentals , Errors of A , Accidental below/above the note |