



Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
b. 40
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt II
..
The long accent present in FE may be a result of carelessness of the engraver of FE, however, Chopin's proofreading cannot be excluded, particularly taking into account the fact that an identical situation occurs a half bar later. In the main text we adopt a long accent both here and in bar 41. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE inaccuracies , Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||
b. 41
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt II
..
An additional staccato dot on the last note of the bar is most probably a result of a mistake of the engraver of GE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE |
|||||
b. 41
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt II
..
Extending the category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE |
|||||
b. 41
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt II
..
The long accent could have been introduced in FE by Chopin (cf. bars 39-40), hence we adopt it to the main text. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents , EE inaccuracies , Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||
b. 42
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt II
..
The missing accent in the editions is almost certainly a result of inaccuracy of the engraver of GE1, who also overlooked slurs in this bar. Cf. bar 44 too. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents , Errors in GE |