![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Issues : EE inaccuracies
- « Previous
- 1
- 2
- Next »
b. 75
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt II
..
Placing the category imprint: Interpretations within context; Editorial revisions issues: Inaccuracies in GE , GE revisions , EE inaccuracies , Centrally placed marks |
|||||||||||||
b. 77
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt II
..
In the main text we preserve the range of the arpeggio wavy line visible in A and confirmed with its interpretation in GE. The longer sign in FE does not seem to be corrected in print, but the version can be regarded as equal – when writing the wavy line in A, Chopin may have not noticed that when he was writing the top part of the sign, there was a temporary shortage of ink. In turn, the placement of the arpeggio in EE is certainly arbitrary. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE , EE inaccuracies |
|||||||||||||
b. 84
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt II
..
The category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in FE , EE inaccuracies |
- « Previous
- 1
- 2
- Next »