Issues : GE revisions
b. 41
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt II
..
In GE2 the grace note was tied with a curved line to the following semiquaver. It is a routine revision, unfortunate in this context, since it suggests sustaining the grace note. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
||||||||||||||||||||
b. 41
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt II
..
The version of the majority of the editions is most probably a result of having misunderstood the notation of A: the erasure of the grace note may be considered the beginning of a slur over the group of semiquavers. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , GE revisions |
||||||||||||||||||||
b. 42
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt II
..
In A there is no before the bottom note of the octave. The patent inaccuracy was corrected in GE (→FE→EE). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Accidentals in different octaves , GE revisions , Inaccuracies in A |
||||||||||||||||||||
b. 42-44
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt II
..
The slurring of the R.H. in A is inaccurate and unclear:
The slurs of A in bar 42 were overlooked in GE1 (→FE→EE); however, in EE parallel slurs on the last beat of the bar were added (it is most probably an editorial revision). In turn, the slur over the demisemiquavers in bar 43 could have been added in GE by Chopin; its beginning is certainly inaccurate, which was corrected in FE (→EE) and GE2. We include the slur, in the version of FE, in the main text, being, apart from that, an interpretation of the slurs of A. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Editorial revisions; Corrections & alterations issues: EE revisions , Inaccurate slurs in A , Corrections in A , GE revisions , Authentic corrections of GE , FE revisions |
||||||||||||||||||||
b. 42-44
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt II
..
In the main text we suggest adding slurs in the L.H. in bar 42 and 44 after the authentic slur in bar 43. Taking into account the presence of the slurs of the R.H. in all three bars, the absence of the slurs in the L.H. must be considered an inaccuracy. The slurs were added already in GE2. category imprint: Editorial revisions issues: GE revisions |