



Issues : Inaccuracies in GE
b. 77-78
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
A later beginning of the slur over the final motif of the first phrase of the theme may be a result of Chopin's proofreading – cf. a similar correction of the slur in analogous bars 3-4. However, an inaccuracy is also highly likely: the slur of GE (→FE→EE) starts from the beginning of the bar, which was clearly preferred by the engraver of GE1. See the note below. category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||||
b. 80
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
The typical long accent visible in A was reproduced in GE1 as category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents , Inaccuracies in GE , EE inaccuracies |
||||||||
b. 83-85
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
The shortened category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , EE inaccuracies |
||||||||
b. 85
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
Leading the slur to the end of the bar is a characteristic inaccuracy of GE1. Similarly in bar 93. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE |
||||||||
b. 87-88
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
The half-bar slurs of GE1 (→FE→EE) are a typical example of schematic thinking of the engraver of GE1. Accurately marked slurs of A were restored in GE2. See also the note at the beginning of the bar. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , GE revisions |