Issues : Inaccuracies in GE
|
b. 53-54
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
The slur of A, although it does not exceed the bar line, undoubtedly concerns the three notes, hence the interpretation of the editions is certainly erroneous. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccurate slurs in A |
||||||
|
b. 55-56
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
The slur in GE1 reaches only to the bar line. The inaccuracy was not repeated in any other edition. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , GE revisions , FE revisions |
||||||
|
b. 56-57
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , GE revisions |
||||||
|
b. 57-58
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
Same as in bars 56-57 and in many others, the schematic slurs of GE1 (→FE→EE) reflect rather habits of the engraver of GE1 than the notation of A. However, it should be pointed out that although the slur in bar 57 (last on the page of A) leads clearly to the next bar, it has no continuation in bar 58. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , GE revisions |
||||||
|
b. 59
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
The slur of A is not absolutely unambiguous, yet its interpretation in GE1 (→FE→EE) is certainly erroneous. The slur in GE2 may be considered an acceptable interpretation; however, in the main text we assume that in A each of six slurs in bars 59-62 embraces a motif made of four semiquavers and a crotchet. See also bar 61. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccurate slurs in A , GE revisions |
in 
