![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Issues : Inaccuracies in FE
b. 234
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
The first two accents in A (→GE1) are clearly long, whereas the next two look like short ones, which, according to us, is an inaccuracy – see bar 226. Both accents are actually written after the note, which was one of the manner of writing long accents in Chopin's previous pieces – cf. bar 230. It is also worth mentioning that the accent on the f1 semiquaver played in the L.H. is even shorter. Unification of the accents in the remaining editions is an arbitrary decision of the engravers of revisers. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Long accents , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions , Inaccuracies in A |
|||||||||||||
b. 241
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
The
In the main text we reproduce the signs of A, yet we lead category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in FE , Unclear hairpins in A , Inaccuracies in A |
|||||||||||||
b. 251
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
The clearly long accents of A were reproduced in GE (→FE→EE) as category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents , Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in FE |
|||||||||||||
b. 252-253
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
An additional staccato dot in GE1 seems to be a mistake, since it is absent in A (cf. bars 249-250). On the other hand, it is the last bar on the page in A, which fosters the appearance of inaccuracies, hence it cannot be excluded that Chopin forgot a dot or dots. The dot is absent in FE (→EE), which may be explained by a mistake, this time of the engraver of FE, by its removal by Chopin in FE or by its addition in the last phase of proofreading of GE1, not included in FE (according to us, Chopin's proofreading is highly unlikely). In this uncertain situation, in the main text we give the version of A, yet the version of GE1 (and even of GE2) may be regarded as potentially corresponding to Chopin's idea. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions |
|||||||||||||
b. 252
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
According to us, all versions of the editions are a result of consecutively overlapping inaccuracies and misunderstandings. In GE the signs were related only to the notes on the bottom stave, which was then inaccurately reproduced in FE and EE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in FE , EE inaccuracies |