Issues : Errors in GE
b. 87
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
In GE1 (→FE→EE) the first group of quavers is provided with the same markings as the next: with a staccato dot on the 1st note and a slur. It is certainly a mistake: an error or rather an attempt of revision. The signs were removed in GE2, restoring the text of A, in which the markings appear in the figures spanning at least a tenth. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions |
||||||||
b. 89
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
In the main text we give the rhythm of A, not raising any source or musical doubts. The version of GE1 (→FE→EE) is probably erroneous:
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Annotations in FED , Errors in GE , GE revisions , Dotted or even rhythm |
||||||||
b. 90
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
The sophisticated articulation marking – legato in the top voice of the octaves and staccato in the bottom one – was only partially reproduced in GE1. In the proofreading of FE (→EE), Chopin restored staccato in the bottom voice. Two out of three dots were added also in GE2. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions , Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||||
b. 93
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
In spite of a clear combination of original slurs in A, put over irregular groups, in GE (→FE→EE) the slur is divided more or less in the middle of the bar (in EE the beginning of the second slur was moved, with a reason in this situation). category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information issues: EE revisions , Corrections in A , Errors in GE |
||||||||
b. 97
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
The division of the slur in the editions is certainly inauthentic. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE |