Issues : Authentic corrections of FE

b. 141

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I

6 dots in A & GE2

No marks in GE1

2 dots in FE (→EE)

..

All staccato dots in the part of the L.H. were overlooked in GE1. When proofreading FE (→EE), Chopin added signs only next to bass notes, which we consider his final decision. Analogous bar 289, whose regular notation of the part of the R.H. seems to be more mature, includes dots in the L.H. only under E and D.

category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations

issues: Errors in GE , Authentic corrections of FE

b. 142

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I

No slur in A (→GE)

Slur in FE (→EE)

Our alternative suggestion

..

The slur was added in the proofreading of FE (→EE) almost certainly by Chopin (together with a staccato dot above E). Taking into account a possibility of an erroneous interpretation of the Chopin entry, we suggest an alternative solution with a slur from the 2nd quaver in the bar. Cf. bar 290

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Authentic corrections of FE

b. 142

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I

No mark in A (→GE)

Staccato dot in FE (→EE)

..

The staccato dot over the 1st quaver in the L.H. was added in the proofreading of FE (→EE), most probably by Chopin.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Authentic corrections of FE

b. 143

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I

No slur in A (→GE)

Slur in FE (→EE)

..

The whole-bar slur of FE (→EE) is almost certainly a Chopin addition.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Authentic corrections of FE

b. 143

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I

..

GE1 (→FE1) has as the 1st quaver. Chopin corrected this mistake in the proofreading of FE2 (→EE). The correct version was introduced also in GE2

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in FE , Errors in GE , GE revisions , Authentic corrections of FE