b. 121-122
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
The missing staccato dots under the E notes are certainly an oversight of GE1 (→FE→EE). The signs were added in GE2, yet only in bar 122, in which they are written more clearly in A. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions |
||||||||
b. 123
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
Starting a slur from the beginning of a bar is a characteristic inaccuracy of GE1 (→FE→EE), corrected in GE2. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , GE revisions |
||||||||
b. 123
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||||
b. 125
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
The slurs of A could be interpreted as GE (→FE→EE) did, since the slur in bar 126 (on a new page) begins over the 1st note in the bar. However, the shape of the slur does not exclude continuation, whereas the slur in bar 125 is clearly dragged beyond the bar line, which makes the intention of a continuous slur much more likely. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccurate slurs in A |
||||||||
b. 125-126
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
The accents in A are clearly long and this is how they were reproduced in GE1 (→FE). The engraver of EE, who, as it seems, considered long accents to be diminuendo signs, shortened the first one, most probably being convinced that it is an accent. In GE2 a similar operation was performed on both signs. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents , GE revisions , EE inaccuracies |