Issues : Long accents
|
b. 73
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents , Errors in GE , GE revisions |
|||||||||||
|
b. 80
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
The typical long accent visible in A was reproduced in GE1 as category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents , Inaccuracies in GE , EE inaccuracies |
|||||||||||
|
b. 96
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
The clearly long accent in A was reproduced in the editions as short. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents , Inaccuracies in GE |
|||||||||||
|
b. 99
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
The change of the font of accents is a characteristic inaccuracy of first editions. In this case, it is the correct interpretation of Chopin's intention in GE1 that is more puzzling, since the first two signs in A are clearly longer than the remaining two and one could expect they would have been reproduced as a category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions |
|||||||||||
|
b. 104
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
In GE1 the second out of three accents was overlooked and the difference in their length was not taken into account. The overlooked accent was restored in the proofreading of FE (most probably by Chopin) and in GE2. The change of font of the accents in EE is a typical revision of this edition. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents , EE revisions , Inaccuracies in GE , Errors in GE , GE revisions , Authentic corrections of FE |
in 
