|
b. 93
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
Same as in analogous bar 85, leading the slur to the end of bar 93 is a characteristic inaccuracy of GE1, which, in this case, included also the beginning of the next bar. Inconsistency with A is even more striking, since Chopin modified both slurs in the manuscript and the result of the corrections does not raise any doubt. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Corrections in A , GE revisions |
|||||||
|
b. 93
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE |
|||||||
|
b. 93
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
In the 2nd half of the bar, we leave the rhythmic notation of the sources, in which the roulade is written with semiquavers (except for the last note). This type of notation, certainly including a suggestion of performing it poco ritenuto, was used by Chopin on a number of occasions, cf. 2nd mov., bar 41 as well as e.g. the Prelude in D category imprint: Source & stylistic information |
|||||||
|
b. 93
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Omissions to cancel alteration , GE revisions , Errors of A |
|||||||
|
b. 93
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
category imprint: Differences between sources |
in 
major, Op. 28 No. 15, bars 4 and 79. However, in this case it is uncertain whether the notation is not only an unintentional result of extending the 2nd half of the roulade – see the 
overlooked by Chopin in 
