Issues : Errors in GE
|
b. 321
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
In A (→GE) there are no accidentals in the last group of semiquavers. In the proofreading of FE (→EE) two flats were added, probably indicated by Chopin, a cautionary before A category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Accidentals in different octaves , Errors in GE , Cautionary accidentals , Authentic corrections of FE , Inaccuracies in A |
|||||||||||||
|
b. 325-327
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
In A bar 325 is the last one on the page. The slur in the L.H. clearly suggests a continuation (similarly as the slur in the R.H.), which, however, is absent on a new page (in bar 326). In GE1 (→FE→EE) the slur was completely overlooked, whereas in GE2 the slur of A together with the overlooked ending was restored. Since this is how Chopin's intention undoubtedly looked like, in this case in the main text we include the slur of GE2. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Inaccurate slurs in A , Errors in GE , GE revisions |
|||||||||||||
|
b. 328-329
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
The division of the slur in GE (→FE), as a result of which the 2nd half in bar 328 is not embraced with a slur at all, is undoubtedly a mistake of the engraver of GE1. The version of FE – without a slur in bar 329 – can be interpreted as an oversight of FE or as a notation of the state of GE1 from before the final retouch. In the second case, the slur of GE1 in bar 329 would be an inaccurate attempt to alleviate the consequences of omission of the final one-and-a-half-bar fragment of the slur. A suitable completion of the slur, this time accurate, was introduced in EE. See also the note on the slur in the L.H. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Errors in GE , GE revisions |
|||||||||||||
|
b. 335
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
The trilled note in A is an erroneous c2. A similar mistake, consisting in writing the upper second of the trilled note instead of the trilled note, while the performance of the trill begins from the upper second, was committed by Chopin also in the Bolero, Op. 19, bar 187 and in the Sonata in B
In the main text we add a cautionary category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions , Errors of A , Authentic corrections of GE |
|||||||||||||
|
b. 336
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
According to us, the version of GE1 (→FE→EE) is a result of a misunderstanding of the sense of the proofreading in the previous bar. The engraver probably considered the c2 crotchet to be related to the trill and constituting its ending. Since in the proofreading a change of the trilled note was marked, he assumed that the crotchet is also to be corrected. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors resulting from corrections , Errors in GE , GE revisions |
and a necessary one before G
before b
