Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
b. 291
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
The missing staccato sign is certainly a mistake of GE1 (→FE→EE). In GE2, in spite of the clear wedge in A, a dot was added. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions , Wedges |
|||||||||||
b. 291
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
It is unclear which type of accent Chopin meant here. The sign is shorter from all previous ones on this page of A (bars 289-290); however, its shape is characteristic of long accents – cf. the accent in bar 293. GE (→FE) has a short accent, which in EE was changed to a vertical sign. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Long accents , EE revisions |
|||||||||||
b. 299-300
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
The change of the font of the accents in the R.H. in bars 299-300 is an example of a characteristic discretion of EE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |
|||||||||||
b. 300
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
In the main text we give the long accent written in A as the only undoubtedly authentic sign. The hairpin in GE1, perhaps added by Chopin, can be considered to be a potentially authentic, equal variant. The versions of the remaining editions are most probably a result of inaccuracies – as in the case of FE (→EE) – or revisions (GE2). category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Long accents , Inaccuracies in FE , Authentic corrections of GE |
|||||||||||
b. 300
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE |