mUltimate Chopin

Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I

Text Compare Notes Sources Description
Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main
Undo Clear

Articulation, Accents, Hairpins

b. 265-266

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I

Accents in A & GE2

No marks in GE1 (→FE→EE)
..

There are neither traces of removal nor reasons to remove the accents in the proofreading of GE1, hence their absence is most probably an oversight. The signs were restored in GE2.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions

b. 271

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I

Accent in A & GE2

No mark in GE1 (→FE→EE)
..

The missing accent is a patent oversight of GE1 (→FE→EE).

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions

b. 271

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I

 in A

No sign in GE (→FE→EE)
..

The  hairpin is poorly visible in A from under the poco ritenuto indication. The engraver of GE1 (as well as the reviser of GE2) could have not noticed it or even considered that the indication had been written with an intention to replace (cross out) the  sign.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in GE

b. 272

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I

..

In GE1 (→FE→EE) the long accent present in A was overlooked. The accent was restored in GE2 but as a short one.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Long accents , Errors in GE , GE revisions

b. 273

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I

Staccato dot in A & GE2

No mark in GE1 (→FE→EE)
..

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions