b. 284-285
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
The earlier beginning of the slur in the editions may be a result of the Chopin proofreading of GE1. However, not being certain thereof, in the main text we give the version of A. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Authentic corrections of GE |
|||||||||
b. 285
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
In the main text we give the long accents of A. In the editions they were reproduced inaccurately as short ones. The differences in the number of accents are a result of oversights and revisions. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents , EE revisions , Errors in FE , Inaccuracies in GE , Errors in GE , GE revisions |
|||||||||
b. 285-286
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
In the main text we add a cautionary before e2 in bar 285 and a before G in bar 286. category imprint: Editorial revisions |
|||||||||
b. 285
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
The version of FE (→EE) is most probably a Terzverschreibung error – in the recapitulation A has an almost unchanged accompaniment, with respect to the exposition, in the entire theme (from bar 273); there are also no visible traces of correction in print in FE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , Terzverschreibung error |
|||||||||
b. 286
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
In A the sign is bigger than the majority of long accents, so it having been reproduced in GE as a hairpin cannot be considered an inaccuracy. According to us, the context, however, definitely supports a long accent, which is in A in the corresponding bar of the exposition by the way (bar 138). The sign in FE (→EE) is an example of a frequently appearing mistake, consisting in reversing the direction of a sign – cf. e.g. the Etude in C minor, Op. 10 No. 12, bar 53. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Long accents , Errors in FE , Sign reversal |