Issues : Errors in GE

b. 142

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I

..

In A, the gruppetto written with small quavers fills the 3rd crotchet of the bar. In GE (→FEEE), small notes started more or less one quaver earlier, which may suggest an erroneous rhythmic layout of the gruppetto.

category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources

issues: Errors in GE , Inaccuracies in A

b. 143

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I

..

GE1 (→FE1) has as the 1st quaver. Chopin corrected this mistake in the proofreading of FE2 (→EE). The correct version was introduced also in GE2

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in FE , Errors in GE , GE revisions , Authentic corrections of FE

b. 145-146

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I

2 staccato dots in A

No marks in GE1 (→FEEE)

1 dot in GE2

..

The overlooked staccato dots over in bar 145 and A in bar 146 are certainly a mistake of GE1 (→FEEE). GE2 added only the dot in bar 145.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions

b. 147-148

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I

cresc. - - in A

No indication in GE (→FEEE)

..

The missing cresc. - - is certainly a mistake of GE (→FEEE), perhaps caused by sempre più stretto having been placed between the staves, hence in a place where cresc. should be. 

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in GE

b. 149-150

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I

Separated slurs in A & GE2

Contiguous slurs in GE1 (→FEEE)

..

In A, the slur led to the minim in bar 150, uncommonly unambiguously – as for a transition into a new page – was, however, totally falsely reproduced in GE1 (→FEEE). It is possible that the engraver first took care of the slur in bar 149, which he considered to be whole bar long, just moved to the right. Then he combined both slurs in bar 150, seeing a whole in them, inaccurately written (both slurs reach quite far into the space between the initial minim and the following it quaver, which could have suggested such an interpretation). In the last slur, he also performed the idea of a continuation from the previous bar, without touching the already finished slur in bar 149. GE2 interpreted here the slurs of A more literally and undoubtedly rightly so.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Inaccurate slurs in A , Errors in GE , GE revisions