b. 172
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
Leading crescendo to in bar 173 seems to be natural, hence in the main text we suggest adding dashes marking the range of this dynamic change. The absence of dashes in the editions is probably a result of an oversight of the engraver of GE1. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Inaccuracies in GE |
|||||||||||
b. 172
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
In the main text we add cautionary flats before e2(3). category imprint: Editorial revisions |
|||||||||||
b. 172
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
The missing one or two accents in the L.H. are certainly a result of mistakes of the engraver of GE1 (→FE→EE) and the reviser of GE2. The change of the type of accents in EE is a routine revision in this edition. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in GE , GE revisions |
|||||||||||
b. 172
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
The absence of the sign in this place is undoubtedly Chopin's oversight, which may have been caused by the transition to a new page (the sign would fall at the end of page of A). category imprint: Editorial revisions issues: No pedal release mark , Inaccuracies in A |
|||||||||||
b. 174
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE |