b. 260-261
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
The very fact of a slur having been added in the proofreading of FE (→EE) by Chopin does not raise doubts, yet its range seems to have been reproduced inaccurately. Therefore, in the main text we suggest a slur led to the beginning of bar 261, after the slur written with Chopin's hand in an analogous motif two bars earlier. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||
b. 261
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions |
||||||
b. 261-263
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
We give the cresc. marking, together with the dashes marking its range, after A (see also bars 263-264). In GE the marking was put slightly further and the dashes were overlooked, whereas FE (→EE1) does not have it at all. The absence of the indication in FE could be explained by a mistake of that edition or by a repetition of the original error of GE1, which was corrected in GE1 only in the last phase of proofreading. The indication was added in EE2 (→EE3) on the basis of comparison with GE1. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Errors in GE |
||||||
b. 263-264
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
In the main text we suggest extending the dashes marking the range of cresc. until in bar 264, in accordance with the musical sense. category imprint: Editorial revisions |
||||||
b. 263-264
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
In A the second halves of these bars are written in an abbreviated manner as minims with a quaver tremolo. In GE1 and subsequent editions, the quavers were written without abbreviations. category imprint: Source & stylistic information issues: GE revisions |