b. 264
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
The change of to is, according to us, an arbitrary revision of GE (or perhaps a simple mistake). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
|||||
b. 264
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
The top most note of the chord on the 4th quaver in GE1 (→FE1) is an erroneous b3. The mistake was corrected – most probably by Chopin – in the proofreading of FE2 (→EE). The correct version is also in GE2. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , Terzverschreibung error , GE revisions , Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||
b. 265
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
One could be looking for Chopin's proofreading in appearing in the editions. However, according to us, a misunderstanding is more likely – the engraver may have introduced by mistake the marking from the previous bar, or, upon looking at the bottom of the page of ½A, he repeated written under the double bass part in Morch. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE |
|||||
b. 265-266
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
There are neither traces of removal nor reasons to remove the accents in the proofreading of GE1, hence their absence is most probably an oversight. The signs were restored in GE2. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions |
|||||
b. 266
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
The absence of c2 in the chords is almost certainly a result of an oversight of the engraver of GE1 (→FE→EE). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions |