Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main


b. 224

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I

ctied in A (1 tie)

ctied in GE1 (2 ties)

crepeated in FE (→EE) & GE2

..

The tie of c1, written in A in accordance with Chopin's habit as a short curved line before the second of the sustained notes, was reproduced accurately in GE1. However, the notation is illegible in print, hence most probably Chopin added a second longer curved line in the proofreading. The notation, which should be clear for anyone who saw A, turned out to be incomprehensible both for the engraver of FE (→EE) and – surprisingly – for the reviser of GE2. As a consequence, despite two ties, the cnote is not sustained in those editions.

category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources

issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions , Authentic corrections of GE

b. 224

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I

..

The notation of the harmonic legato (holding elements of chords with fingers), very detailed in A, was reproduced in the editions inaccurately. A fragment of the stem combining the notes of the a-cthird was not included and the stem extending the first fwas overlooked. As far as the mentioned third is concerned, the notation of A may be theoretically interpreted twofold: with a ccrotchet or with an a-ccrotchet. In this context, it is, however, clear that the bass note is also to be extended.

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: Inaccuracies in GE

b. 225

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I

Slur in A (contextual interpretation) & GE2

2 slurs in GE1 (→FEEE)

..

The slur of A, although it ends slightly earlier, is certainly supposed to embrace the entire semiquaver figuration in the L.H. in this bar and this is how it was reproduced in GE2. The division of the slur in GE1 may be a facilitation used by the engraver (in order to avoid a long slur of an atypical shape) or a proofreading, if initially it was only the bottom slur that was printed.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Inaccurate slurs in A , GE revisions

b. 225

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I

 in A

No sign in GE (→FEEE)

..

The oversight of  in the editions is certainly a mistake, perhaps provoked by lack of space due to the slur.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in GE

b. 225

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I

..

Chopin precisely added accidentals in this bar, together with cautionary naturals before a1 (twice – in the R.H. in the marked place and in the L.H. at the end of the bar) and g2. The first of them seems to be superfluous in this place and it was removed already in GE2. In the main text we add a  before a2

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: GE revisions , Cautionary accidentals