Slurs
|
b. 101-104
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I
..
The slur over the pair of chords, written in GC, was overlooked in GE. The absence of the sign in FE means that the slur in EE must have been added by Chopin in the base text to this edition. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , Authentic corrections of EE |
||||||
|
b. 104
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I
..
The slur in the 2nd volta was added by Chopin in the proofreading of FE3 (→FE4). In the main text we consider it – in accordance with the sense – as continuation of the slur in bars 101-104. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||
|
b. 105-107
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I
..
The slurs under the notes in GE are certainly an arbitrary addition of the editor. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
||||||
|
b. 108
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I
..
The slur over the L.H. part, if not overlooked by the engraver of FE (→EE1), could have been added in GC (→GE) by Chopin. The sign was then added in EE2. Similarly in bar 116. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Authentic corrections in GC |
||||||
|
b. 108-109
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I
..
It is not certain whether the slur was added by Chopin in GC or overlooked in FE1 (→FE2). Anyways, the Chopinesque proofreading of FE3 (→FE4) and of the base text to EE does not leave any doubts concerning Chopin's intention. Cf. bars 109-110. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , Authentic corrections of FE , Authentic corrections of EE |
