![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Issues : Inaccuracies in GC
b. 212-213
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I
..
The absence of the category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions , Inaccuracies in GC |
|||||||||||
b. 218
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I
..
The notation of accidentals in the penultimate chord in the R.H. in bar 218 is inaccurate in the sources. The category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions , Omission of current key accidentals , Inaccuracies in GC |
|||||||||||
b. 218-219
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I
..
GC includes identical sets of accidentals in the last chord in the R.H. in bar 218 and the first one in bar 219 – a
It is worth observing that in GC and FE the
In the main text, we add a cautionary category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions , Inaccuracies in GC |
|||||||||||
b. 219-220
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I
..
The version of GE probably results from a misinterpretation of the notation of GC – in this manuscript, b. 219 ends a great stave, and the slur, due to the discontinuation of ink flow, is poorly visible, hence it seems that it does not go beyond the last crotchet. However, the slur in b. 220 very clearly suggests continuation, which is confirmed by a continuous slur in FE (→EE). category imprint: Differences between sources |
|||||||||||
b. 226
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I
..
The category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in GE , Inaccuracies in GC |