Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main


b. 34-36

composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I

3 accaents in GC & FE (→EE)

in GE1

in GE2

..

The accents in these bars are in GE extended to form  hairpins. This inaccuracy could have resulted from Chopin's placing them – in contrast to bars 25-32 – below the notes, apparently associating them with neighbouring  signs. The sign in bar 35, omitted in GE1, was reinstated in GE2 as a hairpin like the other two.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Inaccuracies in GE , GE revisions

b. 36

composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I

..

In the main text, we add cautionary♭ before a2.

category imprint: Editorial revisions

b. 37-38

composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I

Two accents in GC

Accent in bar 37 in FE

Vertical accent in bar 37 in EE

No marks in GE

..

The accents under the minims of the middle voice of the R.H. are in GC (both) and FE (→EE) – only in bar 37. The missing signs were most probably overlooked as a result of an oversight or misunderstanding.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Errors in GE

b. 37

composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I

Minim without dot in GC (→GE1)

Dotted minim in FE (→ EE) and GE2

..

This is probably the copyist's omission, repeated in GE1 and corrected in GE2.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: GE revisions , Rhythmic errors , Errors of GC , Errors repeated in GE

b. 37-39

composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I

Slur in bars 37-38 in GC (→GE)

Slur in bar 37 in FE, literal reading

Slur to bar 39 in EE

..

The slur in bar 37 in FE reaches the end of line, suggesting a continuation, however, there is no slur in bar 38. It is certainly a mistake because the slur in [A] looked most probably as the one carefully written in GC. Possibly authentic is also the longer slur in EE – Chopin could have written it while proofreading the basis to this edition.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in FE , Uncertain slur continuation , Authentic corrections of EE