b. 165
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I
..
FE (→EE) has a cautionary before g2 in the 5th crotchet of the bar. It is hard to state how the difference between GC and FE occurred – the copyist might have simply overlooked this sign or realised that it is superfluous. Moreover, one cannot exclude an addition made to [A] after GC had already been prepared or a mistake of the engraver of FE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Cautionary accidentals |
|||||||||
b. 166
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I
..
In the main text we add a cautionary before c2. category imprint: Editorial revisions |
|||||||||
b. 168
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I
..
It is hard to state whether the added – probably by Chopin – in FE4 was a correction of a mistake or a change of the concept. According to us, the first possibility seems to be more likely. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||||||
b. 169
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I
..
The tie visible in GC before the chord means an arpeggio in this context. The version of GE, repeated then in EE2, is a result of a routine revision – the sign was moved to the side of the note head of the d1 grace note, which gave it a form of a tie sustaining the grace note (cf. the note on the part of the L.H.). No slur in FE (→EE1) is most probably an oversight. FE1 includes an erroneous c1 as the grace note, which was corrected in the next impressions. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions , FE revisions |
|||||||||
b. 169
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I
..
In the main text we reproduce the little slur running from the grace note in the version of GC, in this case probably closest to [A]. The little slur can be, according to us, interpreted as a conventional sign, by playing the grace note and the fifth, or as a B1-B-f arpeggio. The notation of FE (→EE) is most probably inaccurate (cf. the adjacent note), whereas of GE – routinely revised; at the same time, both eliminate the possibility of a double interpretation. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions |