![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Issues : Inaccuracies in GC
b. 4
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt II
..
FE (except for FE4) lacks in five necessary accidentals – naturals before d2 and b and sharps before f category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Accidentals in different octaves , Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions , Omission of current key accidentals , FE revisions , Inaccuracies in GC , Authentic corrections in GC |
|||||||||
b. 13-14
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt II
..
In some of the sources – GC and GE – the pedalling of these bars is written clearly inaccurately, as holding the pedal beginning on the 2nd beat of bar 13 longer than one crotchet leads to an unjustified mix of harmonies, as far as the sound is concerned. The difference between the sources based directly on [A] – GC and FE – is most easily explained with an oversight of the copyist, although other explanations are also possible. On the other hand, the unnecessarily complex pedalling of FE (→EE) in a faster tempo, without an audible error, may also not entirely reflect Chopin's intention – cf. similar bars 32-34. Therefore, in the main text we suggest a variant solution, leaving a possible use of pedal on the 2nd beat of bar 13 at the discretion of the perfomer. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , Inaccuracies in GC |
|||||||||
b. 17-21
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt II
..
No slur in FE1 is undoubtedly an oversight of the engraver, corrected – certainly on the basis of [A] – in FE2. However, it is not entirely clear what the range of the slur intended by Chopin was, as the sources based on [A] seem to convey different versions and both the copyist and the engraver of FE did not always faithfully reproduce Chopin's notation. In addition, the slur of GC, despite the fact that it clearly reaches the beginning of bar 21, cannot be considered to be unambiguous – the beginning of the slur also exceeds the bar line, which cannot mean its starting in bar 16. It is the recapitulation that comes to help (bars 205-209), in which the engraver of FE1, looking at the same place of [A], interpreted the slur differently than for the first time, yet in accordance with the more likely, literal interpretation of GC. Due to this fact, in the main text we give the slur reaching until E category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , FE revisions , Inaccuracies in GC |
|||||||||
b. 24
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt II
..
In GC and FE (except for FE4) five necessary accidentals are missing – the naturals before d1, d2 and b and sharps before f category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Accidentals in different octaves , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions , EE inaccuracies , FE revisions , Inaccuracies in GC |
|||||||||
b. 25
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt II
..
The naturals before the 3rd octave of the bar are only in EE, FE4 and GE2. Chopin's patent inaccuracy was completed by revisers in probably all cases (certainly in GE2). category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions , Omission of current key accidentals , FE revisions , Inaccuracies in GC |