Issues : FE revisions
|
b. 216-217
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt II
..
The slur over the pair of octaves is overlooked in FE1. The mistake was corrected already in FE2. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , FE revisions |
|||||||||
|
b. 228-229
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt II
..
The absence of the naturals raising g category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Errors in EE , GE revisions , Authentic corrections of FE , FE revisions |
|||||||||
|
b. 232
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt II
..
In GC and FE1 (→FE2→FE3) there is no category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Accidentals in different octaves , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions , Cautionary accidentals , FE revisions , Inaccuracies in GC |
|||||||||
|
b. 243-244
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt II
..
In the main text, we give a category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions , FE revisions |
|||||||||
|
b. 244
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt II
..
Overlooked naturals before the octaves in the L.H. – see bar 56. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: EE revisions , Accidentals in different octaves , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions , Omission of current key accidentals , EE inaccuracies , FE revisions |
(1) to g(1) is almost certainly a mistake of Chopin who partially corrected his error in the proofreading of 
on the 2nd crotchet in bar 228. In 
was unnecessarily repeated before g
1 in the chord in the L.H.
in 
sign was also overlooked). Our alternative suggestion is an asterisk [