Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
b. 193
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt II
..
One longer sign in FE (→EE), including also bar 194, is most probably an arbitrary decision of the engraver of FE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: FE revisions , Hairpins denoting continuation |
||||||||
b. 194
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt II
..
Adding in FE (→EE) to the sign in bar 193 is most probably an arbitrary decision of the engraver of FE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: FE revisions , Hairpins denoting continuation |
||||||||
b. 196
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt II
..
In the main text we give accents of different length according to FE. The lack of such difference in EE is a typical inaccuracy of Chopin's first editions, and no accents in GC (→GE) is an oversight of the copyist (cf. bar 8). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents , EE inaccuracies |
||||||||
b. 209
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt II
..
Due to the abbreviated notation of the recapitulation of Scherzo in the manuscripts, the state of the sources is same here as in bar 21. category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||||
b. 210-213
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt II
..
In the main text we suggest adding the staccato signs and accents on the basis of respective bars of the initial section of Scherzo (bars 22-25). The abbreviated notation of the recapitulation in [A] (→GC) proves that Chopin wanted that the notation of both extreme sections was identical. category imprint: Editorial revisions |