



Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
b. 46-49
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt II
..
The differentiated source versions of the signs of a dynamic character – accents and category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Errors in FE , Authentic corrections in GC , Authentic corrections of EE |
||||||||||||
b. 48-49
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt II
..
The staccato dots for the L.H., repeated after the authentic signs in the part of the R.H., are almost certainly an addition of the revision of EE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |
||||||||||||
b. 51-53
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt II
..
The staccato dot over the 2nd crotchet in bar 51 was overlooked in FE (→EE), which is proved by its presence in the respective bar of the recapitulation (bar 239). In the main text, we suggest adding a dot also in analogous bar 53, which is certainly to be performed similarly. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions |
||||||||||||
b. 61
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt II
..
The staccato dot over the 1st octave was most probably added by Chopin in the base text to EE. According to us, the aim of its addition could have been a sui generis correction of a too early started slur – see the note above. Therefore, choosing the suggested by us alternative version of the slur, one does not have to take this dot into consideration. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Authentic corrections of EE |
||||||||||||
b. 69-70
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt II category imprint: Differences between sources issues: FE revisions , Hairpins denoting continuation |