Issues : Inaccuracies in FE
|
b. 164-168
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt II
..
The slur of GC (→GE) includes only this part of the five-bar-long melodic passage whose performance Chopin assigned to the left hand. It is certainly an inaccuracy, perhaps repeated after [A] (the original version?). In turn, a respective slur in FE is broken at the end of the text's line and most probably it was supposed to be led to the end of the phrase (Chopin could have extended it in [A] already after having prepared GC). There is no doubt it is necessary to embrace the entire passage with a slur, if we take into consideration the authentic slurring of analogous phrases. Both possibilities of starting the slur – from the first or second beat of bar 164 – can be considered to be equal. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions , Inaccuracies in GC , Authentic corrections of EE |
|||||||||||
|
b. 232
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt II
..
In GC and FE1 (→FE2→FE3) there is no category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Accidentals in different octaves , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions , Cautionary accidentals , FE revisions , Inaccuracies in GC |
|||||||||||
|
b. 244
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt II
..
Overlooked naturals before the octaves in the L.H. – see bar 56. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: EE revisions , Accidentals in different octaves , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions , Omission of current key accidentals , EE inaccuracies , FE revisions |
|||||||||||
|
b. 263-264
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt II
..
It is not certain who interpreted Chopin's intention in [A] more accurately – the copyist in GC (→GE) or the engraver of FE (→EE). According to us, an earlier change of pedal in FE seems to be less likely. The notation of GC may be interpreted in three ways, out of which the literal interpretation, adopted in GE2, is dubious from the pianistic point of view. The remaining two – given in GE1 and our main text – are natural from the pianistic point of view and can be considered to be equal. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE , Inaccuracies in GC |
|||||||||||
|
b. 266-273
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt II
..
In the main text, we give dim. indication already in bar 266, according to GC (→GE). Its later occurrence in FE (→EE) could have been due to the new line starting at bar 267. The lack of the later indications – rallentando and lento – is certainly a result of engraver's oversight. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE , Errors in GE , GE revisions |
before the top most note of the 3rd crotchet in the R.H. The patent inaccuracy was corrected in 
was unnecessarily repeated before g
1 in the chord in the L.H.
