mUltimate Chopin

Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt II

Text Compare Notes Sources Description

Issues : Authentic corrections in GC

Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main
Undo Clear

b. 168

composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt II

..

In GC the bar is written in an abbreviated manner as repetition of the previous one. At the same time, one can see that initially the bar was completely overlooked, whereas a relevant abbreviation was written as an addition. It cannot be excluded that the mistake (or unclear notation) was also in [A]. If so, Chopin had to write a respective addition also there, as FE contains the correct number of bars.

category imprint: Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information

issues: Errors of A , Abbreviated notation of A , Authentic corrections in GC

b. 275-276

composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt II

in GC

No sign in FE (→EE) & GE
..

The  hairpin was probably added in GC by Chopin. The missing sign in GE is certainly a mistake of the engraver who perhaps was not sure where to put the sign.

category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations

issues: Errors in GE , Authentic corrections in GC