b. 148
|
composition: Op. 64 No 2, Waltz in C♯ minor
..
The lack of pedalling in GE2op (→GE3op) is probably a result of a revision unifying bars 132 and 148. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
|||||
b. 153
|
composition: Op. 64 No 2, Waltz in C♯ minor
..
The absence of the sign, clearly written in A, is probably a mistake of the engraver of FE (→GE,EE). After a longer fragment marked in A in an abbreviated way, the bar is the first written out entirely, so that it seems to be likely that instead of reproducing the actual notation of this bar, the engraver repeated the notation of bar 25. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE |
|||||
b. 154-158
|
composition: Op. 64 No 2, Waltz in C♯ minor
..
The five-time use of the 1st finger, marked in FES certainly on the basis of Chopin's hint, is included by us in the main text in bars 26-30 (cf. General Editorial Principles, p. 17). category imprint: Differences between sources |
|||||
b. 155-156
|
composition: Op. 64 No 2, Waltz in C♯ minor
..
The tie of c2, written in FED probably by Chopin, may be considered an authentic variant with respect to the repeated note present in all remaining sources (except for GE2no2). Similarly in bars 157-158. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations |
|||||
b. 157-158
|
composition: Op. 64 No 2, Waltz in C♯ minor
..
The tie of b1, written in FED perhaps by Chopin, may be considered an authentic variant. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations |