b. 97-98
|
composition: Op. 64 No 3, Waltz in A♭ major
..
Sustaining the chord at the transition between the bars is certainly an arbitrary revision of GE2op (→GE3op), introduced by analogy to identical bars 93-94. Both autographs prove that Chopin considered the version of bars 93-94 to be a one-off rhythmic diversification of the four-time repeated scheme. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
|||||||||
b. 98
|
composition: Op. 64 No 3, Waltz in A♭ major
..
In the manuscripts there is no lowering d2 to d2. The composer's patent oversight was corrected in FE (→GE,EE). category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions , Omission of current key accidentals , Errors of A |
|||||||||
b. 99
|
composition: Op. 64 No 3, Waltz in A♭ major
..
The slur over the pair of chords could have been added by Chopin in the proofreading of FE. In GE1Ab it was moved under the chords, as a result of which it can be considered to be a tie of f1. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Placement of markings , GE revisions , Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||||||
b. 100
|
composition: Op. 64 No 3, Waltz in A♭ major
..
In A there are no accidentals in the part of the R.H. This patent in this context oversight was corrected in FE (→GE,EE). category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Accidentals in different octaves , Omission of current key accidentals , Authentic corrections of FE , Inaccuracies in A |
|||||||||
b. 105-106
|
composition: Op. 64 No 3, Waltz in A♭ major
..
In the main text, we give the hairpin on the basis of A. The versions of the editions are either an inaccurate image of A, as it is in the case of FE (→EE), or a result of a revision unifying similar places – GE2op (→GE3op). In the remaining GE the sign was overlooked. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE , Scope of dynamic hairpins , Errors in GE , GE revisions |