Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main


Articulation, Accents, Hairpins

b. 26-28

composition: Op. 25 No 12, Etude in C minor

5 long accents in FC

10 short accents in FE

6 short accents in EE

5 short accents in GE1

6 short accents in GE2 (→GE3)

6 long accents suggested by the editors

..

Same as in bar 24, in the main text we give long accents, written most probably by Chopin in FC. The missing first sign in bar 28 is certainly an oversight, corrected in GE2 (→GE3).

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: GE revisions , Authentic corrections of FC

b. 29-32

composition: Op. 25 No 12, Etude in C minor

Accents between or above notes in FC & FE

Accents below or above notes in EE1 (→EE2)

Accents above notes in GE & EE3

Double accents suggested by the editors

..

In these bars, placing the accents at the beginning of the passages between the notes is impeded, as it would be necessary for them to be placed in the area of ledger lines, which would hinder the legibility of the text. In FC and FE, which most probably faithfully convey the notation of [A], such notation is to be seen only in bars 29 and 32, Chopin placed the remaining accents over the notes. The latter was adopted in GE and EE2 in all the discussed bars, whereas in EE1 (→EE2) in four out of the five cases. In the main text, in order to underline that the accents refer to the notes performed by the both hands, we suggest double accents (cf. bars 13-14). The notation could have been used by Chopin in bar 46.

category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

issues: EE revisions , GE revisions

b. 41-42

composition: Op. 25 No 12, Etude in C minor

Accents between notes in FC, FE & GE2 (→GE3)

2 different accents in EE1 (→EE2)

2 different accents in GE1

3 different accents in EE3

Pairs of accents suggested by the editors

..

All source notations certainly mean the same – an accent referring to both notes struck in the middle of the bar. In the main text we adopt the version with two accents – see bars 13-14.

category imprint: Editorial revisions

issues: EE revisions , GE revisions

b. 43-44

composition: Op. 25 No 12, Etude in C minor

Different accents in FC

Accents below L.H. part in FE & GE1

Pairs of accents in EE

Accents between notes in GE2 (→GE3)

..

Same as in the previous two bars, all source notations certainly mean the same – an accent referring to both notes on the 9th semiquaver of the bar. Marking it with a pair of accents could have been introduced into the base text to EE by Chopin, although additions of single accents by the editor also seem to be likely.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: GE revisions

b. 45-46

composition: Op. 25 No 12, Etude in C minor

Accents between or above notes in FC

Accents above notes in EE & GE

Accents above notes or pairs of accents in FE

Pairs of accents suggested by the editors

..

In these bars Chopin was also looking for a deft way of marking the accents referring simultaneously to the parts of both hands (cf. bars 29-32 and 41-44). In the main text, in both texts we adopt pairs of accents used in FE – most probably by Chopin – in the 2nd half of bar 46.

category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

issues: GE revisions