Verbal indications
|
b. 6-8
|
composition: Op. 25 No 11, Etude in A minor
..
The dim. indication was added by Chopin in GC (→GE), most probably also in the base text to EE. Its absence in FE proves that Chopin probably omitted the base text to this edition at the time of completing the Stichvorlage manuscripts in these bars. Similarly category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: EE revisions , GE revisions , Authentic corrections in GC |
||||||||||||||
|
b. 9-10
|
composition: Op. 25 No 11, Etude in A minor
..
The marcato indication in GC is written by the copyist, which, considering the absence of indication in FE, probably means that Chopin wrote it in the base text to EE. It is, however, not so obvious in the case of repetition of this indication in EE in bar 10, as it is not included in any of the sources. Therefore, in the main text we give only the first of them. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |
||||||||||||||
|
b. 13
|
composition: Op. 25 No 11, Etude in A minor
..
Same as in bar 5, category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Authentic corrections in GC |
||||||||||||||
|
b. 23
|
composition: Op. 25 No 11, Etude in A minor
..
The category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Authentic corrections in GC |
||||||||||||||
|
b. 24-26
|
composition: Op. 25 No 11, Etude in A minor
..
Quite a significant difference in the range of the diminuendo indication suggests that it was written by Chopin in GC and base text to EE independently. The earlier ending of the dashes determining the range of this indication in GE1 is probably a result of an inaccurate interpretation of GC and perhaps also difficulties with finding place for some of them. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Authentic corrections in GC |
in 
in 
performed with Chopin's hand. Here, however, Chopin forgot to introduce a new indication in the base text to 
