Pitch
b. 108
|
composition: Op. 25 No 10, Etude in B minor
..
FE has an a1 as the 3rd crotchet of the middle voice in the R.H. It is almost certainly the so-called Terzverschreibung error. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , Omissions to cancel alteration , Errors in GE , Terzverschreibung error , GE revisions , Errors of GC |
|||||
b. 108
|
composition: Op. 25 No 10, Etude in B minor
..
Lack of the middle note on the 3rd beat of the bar is almost certainly a mistake of GC (→GE1). category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , Omissions to cancel alteration , GE revisions , Errors of GC |
|||||
b. 113
|
composition: Op. 25 No 10, Etude in B minor
..
In GC (→GE1) and EE, there are no accidentals before the crotchets, so they should read as c and c2. In spite of the fact that the version does not raise any doubts as far as the sound is concerned, the omission of the naturals is proved by:
category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors in EE , Errors in GE , GE revisions , Omission of current key accidentals , Authentic corrections of FE , Errors of GC |
|||||
b. 114
|
composition: Op. 25 No 10, Etude in B minor category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: GE revisions |
|||||
b. 116
|
composition: Op. 25 No 10, Etude in B minor
..
There are no accidentals before the last octave in the R.H. in GC and EE1 (→EE2). Chopin added the overlooked naturals in the proofreading of FE, they are also in GE and EE3. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , GE revisions , Authentic corrections of FE |