Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Verbal indications
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main


Verbal indications

b. 67-69

composition: Op. 25 No 10, Etude in B minor

No indication in GC (→GE)

in bars 67-69 in FE

in bars 68-69 in EE

..

The difference in the placement of the dim. - - indication in FE and EE proves its independent addition in the base texts to these editions. It is also possible that, as it was probably in analogous bars 47-49 and 87-89, Chopin added the indication in the proofreading of FE.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Authentic corrections of FE

b. 85

composition: Op. 25 No 10, Etude in B minor

No indication in GC (→GE1), FE & EE

rit. in GE2 (→GE3)

[rit.] suggested by the editors

..

For the third time (after bar 45 and 65) Chopin did not add the rit. indication. According to us, it is an oversight, hence in the main text we suggest adding this indication. A respective revision was performed already in GE2 (→GE3).

category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

issues: GE revisions , Omitted correction of an analogous place

b. 87-89

composition: Op. 25 No 10, Etude in B minor

No indication in GC (→GE) & EE

in FE

category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations

issues: Authentic corrections of FE

b. 100-101

composition: Op. 25 No 10, Etude in B minor

in GC (→GE) & EE

No second part of indication in FE

..

The sotto voce indication was completed in GC and probably in the base text to EE. In GC one can see that Chopin initially wrote a different indication (probably e legato only), to eventually choose e sempre legato.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Chopin's hesitations , Authentic corrections of FE