b. 113
|
composition: Op. 25 No 10, Etude in B minor
..
In GC (→GE1) and EE, there are no accidentals before the crotchets, so they should read as c and c2. In spite of the fact that the version does not raise any doubts as far as the sound is concerned, the omission of the naturals is proved by:
category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors in EE , Errors in GE , GE revisions , Omission of current key accidentals , Authentic corrections of FE , Errors of GC |
||||||
b. 114
|
composition: Op. 25 No 10, Etude in B minor category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: GE revisions |
||||||
b. 115-118
|
composition: Op. 25 No 10, Etude in B minor
..
The slur for the L.H. – added most probably by Chopin – is only in GC (→GE; in GE1, as a result of mistake, the slur starts only in bar 116). The beginning of the slur suggests continuation, however, as it is unknown, in which moment it should start earlier, we assume that it concerns only these notes under which it is written. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Authentic corrections in GC |
||||||
b. 116
|
composition: Op. 25 No 10, Etude in B minor
..
There are no accidentals before the last octave in the R.H. in GC and EE1 (→EE2). Chopin added the overlooked naturals in the proofreading of FE, they are also in GE and EE3. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , GE revisions , Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||
b. 116
|
composition: Op. 25 No 10, Etude in B minor
..
We add cautionary naturals before the 2nd octave (D-d), and we remove flats, unnecessarily repeated before the 10th octave (G-g). category imprint: Editorial revisions issues: Cautionary accidentals |