b. 78
|
composition: Op. 25 No 10, Etude in B minor
..
The accent was most probably added by Chopin at the time of proofreading FE. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||
b. 79-82
|
composition: Op. 25 No 10, Etude in B minor
..
Omission of the pedalling signs in FE in bar 80 is certainly an oversight (cf. bars 31-32), therefore, in the main text we suggest to complete them after all previous analogous bars. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Inaccuracies in FE , Authentic corrections of FE , Omitted correction of an analogous place |
||||||
b. 79-80
|
composition: Op. 25 No 10, Etude in B minor
..
The slur embracing the phrase in the middle voice was added by Chopin most probably in the proofreading of FE. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||
b. 79
|
composition: Op. 25 No 10, Etude in B minor
..
According to us, regardless of how the difference occurred (in the sources there are no clear traces of possible corrections in this regard), omission of the hairpins in FE was a conscious and final decision of Chopin. In Chopin notation, this kind of sign emphasises the note or group of notes, which in this case would suggest beginning the phrase of the middle voice together with the return of the main thematic link in this part, contrary to the later, consistent markings of FE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
||||||
b. 80
|
composition: Op. 25 No 10, Etude in B minor
category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: EE revisions , Authentic corrections of FE |